ciushku

WEB 2.0 (ca nu imi ajungea o durere de cap…)

 

Time bar of Web 2.0 buzz words.^[4] This image shows the age of some buzzwords sometimes used in Web 2.0 lingo and its dependencies.

Alluding to the version-numbers that commonly designate software upgrades, the phrase "Web 2.0" hints at an improved form of the World Wide Web; advocates suggest that technologies such as weblogs, social bookmarking, wikis, podcasts, RSS feeds (and other forms of many-to-many publishing), social software, Web APIs, Web standards and online Web services imply a significant change in web usage.

As used by its proponents, the phrase "Web 2.0" can also refer to one or more of the following:

• The transition of Web sites from isolated information silos to sources of content and functionality, thus becoming computing platforms serving web applications to end-users 
• A social phenomenon embracing an approach to generating and distributing Web content itself, characterized by open communication, decentralization of authority, freedom to share and re-use, and "the market as a conversation"
• Enhanced organization and categorization of content, emphasizing deeplinking 
• A rise in the economic value of the Web, possibly surpassing the impact of the dot-com boom of the late 1990s

Earlier users of the phrase "Web 2.0" employed it as a synonym for "Semantic Web," and indeed, the two concepts complement each other. The combination of social-networking systems such as FOAF and XFN with the development of tag-based folksonomies, delivered through blogs and wikis, sets up a basis for a semantic web environment.^{[citation needed]}

 

On September 30, 2005, Tim O’Reilly wrote a piece summarizing the subject. The mind-map pictured above (constructed by Markus Angermeier on November 11, 2005) sums up the memes of Web 2.0, with example-sites and services attached.

In the opening talk of the first Web 2.0 conference, Tim O’Reilly and John Battelle summarized key principles of Web 2.0 applications:

• the web as a platform 
• data as the driving force
• network effects created by an architecture of participation 
• innovation in assembly of systems and sites composed by pulling together features from distributed, independent developers (a kind of "open source" development)
• lightweight business models enabled by content and service syndication
• the end of the software adoption cycle ("the perpetual beta")
• software above the level of a single device, leveraging the power of The Long Tail.
• easy to pick up by early adopters

Tim O’ Reilly gave examples of companies or products that embody these principles in his description of his "four plus one" levels in the hierarchy of Web 2.0-ness:^[5]

• Level 3 applications, the most "Web 2.0," which could only exist on the Internet, deriving their power from the human connections and network effects that Web 2.0 makes possible, and growing in effectiveness the more people use them. O’Reilly gives as examples: eBay, craigslist, Wikipedia, del.icio.us, Skype, dodgeball, WorkACE and Adsense.
• Level 2 applications, which can operate offline but which gain advantages from going online. O’Reilly cited Flickr, which benefits from its shared photo-database and from its community-generated tag database.
• Level 1 applications, also available offline but which gain features online. O’Reilly pointed to Writely (since 10 October 2006: Google Docs & Spreadsheets, offering group-editing capability online) and iTunes (because of its music-store portion).
• Level 0 applications would work as well offline. O’Reilly gave the examples of MapQuest, Yahoo! Local, and Google Maps. Mapping applications using contributions from users to advantage can rank as level 2.
• non-web applications like email, instant-messaging clients and the telephone.

” salut

te vad in tema si cu un nerv in tine asa ca ma decit asupra ta cu urmatoarea intrebare:

“Totusi, ce inseamna BLOG????” un jurnal on-line??? si daca ii jurnal de ce nu ii confidential?? si de ce sa posteze si altii in el??? si care ii satisfactia sa ai blog??? sa ai o pagina despre tine?? asta ii singura modalitate de a te face remarcat??? sau tine de frustrare si de lipsa de socializare??? si de ce treb sa fiu mandru cata lume mi-l citeste?? si cum afla cineva de blogu meu??? il trimit eu ca un distrus la toata lumea?? imi fac reclama?

si as mai avea vreo cateva…
da macar la astea te rog daca ai putin timp.
ms mult
have fun
ciaules”

….de la un fan am primit acest e-mail… sac sac pentru cine nu are fani:)) acum nu stiu daca are vre-o legatura cu plecarea mea de pe o platforma pe alta de blogging dar sa zicem ca nu are nici o legatura. Sa zicem ca nu are… si o sa-i fac placerea omului care s-a obosit sa-mi scrie si am sa-i raspund poate mai cuviincios decat s-ar astepta:)

3 Responses to “De la fani”